A Thor missile being raised on its erector, above a concrete emplacement and associated equipment.
A Thor missile being raised from its horizontal position. This US Air Force photograph illustrates the equipment; its original date and location are not established in the source record.US Air Force / National Museum of the US Air Force, image 090514-F-1234P-002, via Wikimedia Commons. Source record · Public domain — US government workView full image ↗
Country:
United States; deployed in Britain
Type:
Intermediate-range ballistic missile
Force:
60 missiles at 20 RAF stations
Control:
British operations; American warhead custody
Length:
Approximately 20 metres (65 feet)
Range:
1,500 nautical miles (about 2,780 km)
Propellants:
Kerosene-based fuel and liquid oxygen

Its place in the crisis

Project Emily placed three Thor missiles at each of twenty RAF stations. The force was organised into four groups and brought a fixed nuclear-missile deployment into eastern England.

Thor depended on both British and American participation. Readying the missile, releasing the nuclear warhead and authorising a launch were separate matters. The British deployment was part of the wider strategic confrontation even though its bases were far from Cuba.

Withdrawal took place in 1963, but its planning preceded the crisis. It must not be confused with the confidential American assurance about Jupiter missiles in Turkey.

Sources for this passage: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

What the launch crew had to prepare

Thor was a liquid-propellant missile. Its kerosene-based fuel and liquid oxygen oxidiser supplied the engine for the powered part of the flight; the warhead then continued towards its target on a ballistic trajectory. Liquid oxygen required handling and replenishment, so the missile’s readiness depended on its supporting equipment and trained crews as well as the rocket itself.

The British installations were exposed launch positions rather than buried silos. Each station’s three missiles needed control facilities, maintenance, security and American warhead custodians. Their visibility and fixed locations made vulnerability an important part of the deterrent calculation.

Sources for this passage: [1] [4] [5]

What the October alert meant in Britain

The RAF’s published account records fifty-nine of the sixty Thor missiles at fifteen-minute readiness during the crisis. This described a preparation state, not an order to launch. Political authorisation and the British–American control arrangements remained essential.

The force operated alongside Bomber Command’s aircraft. A war spreading to Europe could have involved these British bases even if its first shots were fired in the Caribbean. The separate Thor chapter follows the crews, four station groups, testing programme and surviving launch sites in more detail.

Sources for this passage: [6] [2]

More views

A Thor missile being loaded into the open rear cargo door of a C-133 transport aircraft.
Transporting a Thor in a Douglas C-133 Cargomaster. This US Air Force photograph illustrates the airlift supporting the programme; its exact date and location are not established.US Air Force / National Museum of the US Air Force, via Wikimedia Commons. Source record · Public domain — US government workView full image ↗
A Thor missile lifting off its launch pad, with exhaust below and vapour around the rocket.
A Thor test launch at Cape Canaveral, Florida, 12 May 1959. This is a US test-range photograph, not a launch from a British base or an event during the Cuban crisis.US Air Force / National Museum of the US Air Force, image 090514-F-1234P-003, via Wikimedia Commons. Source record · Public domain — US government workView full image ↗

Follow the story